Should drug tests be mandatory for welfare Research Paper

Should drug tests be mandatory for welfare - Research Paper Example In fact, most laws that govern the welfare do not fulfill what their supporters say, and sometimes they may be unconstitutional. The constitution prohibits the government from carrying out unnecessary and unreasonable searches. The constitution also stipulates that all people are innocent until proven guilty. On the contrary, passing such laws that require drug tests for welfare would means that all welfare applicants are guilty, and that they have to prove their innocence. Treating all welfare applicants like criminals, in order for them to qualify for any assistance, is neither ethical nor acceptable (Dilla 586). Is it a crime to be poor and being in need of assistance? It is high time that people came out in large number to protest against laws that make drug test a must for the welfare; such tests only serve to discriminate against the poor. The claim that many drug users goes to welfare to get money to support their illegal habits does not have solid evidence; it is a type of lo ng-standing stereotypes. Researchers have shown that there is no appreciable difference in the rate of illegal-drug use, between recipients of welfare and other people. Besides, the claim that drug testing help save tax dollars does not have any supporting facts. In fact, studies have shown that the costs involved in drug testing exceed any money saved. What really does the law intend to accomplish or fulfill? Drug users will never stop abusing drugs even if they are cut off from public assistance (Lawless & Fox 365). Drug testing for welfare applicants is a way of stigmatizing the needy.... Indeed, it may make some people to stop seeking for such welfare, which they really need for proper maintenance of their children. Why drug tests be made mandatory for welfare applicants, and yet there so many other government programs that do not require drug tests? Several people benefit from such programs without having to go through any drug tests. For instance, retired state workers receive pension, businesspersons get state contracts, and farmers receive crop subsidies, without undergoing any drug tests. If drug tests are to be made mandatory for welfare, then, all applicants of other government programs should undergo through various drugs test (Lawless et al 372). It is not fair at all to only include welfare applicants for drug testing, while excluding the other programs. Drug testing is unreasonable search, and there is no safety reason to be concerned about drug use by welfare applicants or recipients. The supporters of drug test for welfare applicants only target the most vulnerable or needy. Any states that support such tests should enforce better enforcement policies and stricter laws, which apply to the whole population, and not to only the most vulnerable people (Brezina 27). However, enforcement of such laws will be of no great help to the needy. This is because most laws are not about drug use; they aim at solving economical crises or problems. Additionally, may only deny marijuana users’ applicants and applicants on other drugs like meth, coke, and crack. This is because marijuana takes approximately a month to get out of an individual system. Therefore, the aim of such a law will not be met since drug users, with the exception of marijuana users, can

Identification Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Identification - Essay Example Most members establish the need to be part of this party as it sought to eradicate job discrimination and racism that had most affected the African American populations. Dixiecrats movement played a historical significance in the United States. Based on this research, it opposed the anti-poll tax legislation and equality in employment and recruitment practices. The movement pledged to uphold white supremacy and uphold segregation. Although the movement have been dismissed as a failed third party, it was significant to the southern economical and political change. Dixiecrats were important White Citizens members along with other massive resistance organizations that were dedicated to uphold segregation that later flourished throughout the southern region from 1950s and 1960s. Since then, the ideological and political lines were drawn between the Republican and Democrat parties as liberals and moderates, which were converted from Republicans to Democrats. The party ensured that justice prevailed in the United States without any presence of racism or discrimination. Betty Friedan The feminine mystique Betty Friedan is widely credited for his nonfiction book The Feminine Mystique. This book was first published in 1963 that addressed the aspects revolving feminism in the United States. In her book, Betty discusses how women were denied their rights in the 1950s and early 1960s. Her book discussed the lives of women as housewives who were unhappy in their marriages. Betty points out that women were discriminated in the society while men were given the rights to rule, make wealth, and dictate in their families. Her book was a wakeup call to the United States that women wanted more than what they were given by the society. The book creates the concept of feminine mystique in that it addressed women as being devoted to being mothers and housewives. In the final chapter of her book, Betty advocates that women should view themselves more than homemakers and mothers. They should find total fulfilment in their lives by finding meaningful task that utilizes their full mental or brain capacity. The historic significance behind this book is that, it created a strong ground for Americans to understand how women were discriminated in the society. The book created great insights that women in the American society should enjoy their lives, abilities, and skills. In so doing, the author believed that this would enhance a positive impact in the American society. Betty Friedan’s book, the Feminine Mystique enhanced a significant change on the 1950s and 60s image of women. It helped many women to realize their potential in the American society. The book enabled the American society to respect women in the society. Many understood that women were more than house wives or mothers. Great Society/War on poverty The war on poverty or Great society was the legislation introduced by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964. The president proposed this legislation to dea l with the high poverty rate that had affected the United States. As part of the war on poverty, President Johnson expanded the government’s function in health care and education. He believed that these were best strategies that would eradicate poverty in the United States. The major society programs were intended to deter poverty by boosting